Board Responsibilities and Structures — FAQs
BoardSource has been fielding governance-related questions posed by nonprofit leaders for over 30 years. Here are the answers to those questions most frequently asked about board responsibilities and structures.
- Determine mission and purpose.
It is the board’s responsibility to create and review a statement of mission and purpose that articulates the organization’s goals, means, and primary constituents served.
- Select the chief executive.
Boards must reach consensus on the chief executive’s responsibilities and undertake a careful search to find the most qualified individual for the position.
- Support and evaluate the chief executive.
The board should ensure that the chief executive has the moral and professional support they need to further the goals of the organization.
- Ensure effective planning.
Boards must actively participate in an overall planning process and assist in implementing and monitoring the plan’s goals.
- Monitor and strengthen programs and services.
The board’s responsibility is to determine which programs are consistent with the organization’s mission and monitor their effectiveness.
- Ensure adequate financial resources.
One of the board’s foremost responsibilities is to secure adequate resources for the organization to fulfill its mission.
- Protect assets and provide proper financial oversight.
The board must assist in developing the annual budget and ensuring that proper financial controls are in place.
- Build a competent board.
All boards have a responsibility to articulate prerequisites for candidates, orient new members, and periodically and comprehensively evaluate their own performance.
- Ensure legal and ethical integrity.
The board is ultimately responsible for adherence to legal standards and ethical norms.
- Enhance the organization’s public standing.
The board should clearly articulate the organization’s mission, accomplishments, and goals to the public and garner support from the community through advocacy.
Nonprofit board members have the legal responsibility to meet the duty of care, the duty of loyalty, and the duty of obedience. Under well-established principles of nonprofit corporation law, a board member must meet certain standards of conduct and attention in carrying out their responsibilities to the organization. Several states have statutes adopting some variation of these duties that would be used in court to determine whether a board member acted improperly. These standards are usually described as the duty of care, the duty of loyalty, and the duty of obedience.
- Duty of Care
The duty of care describes the level of competence that is expected of a board member and is commonly expressed as the duty of “care that an ordinarily prudent person would exercise in a like position and under similar circumstances.” This means that a board member owes the duty to exercise reasonable care when they make a decision as a steward of the organization.
- Duty of Loyalty
The duty of loyalty is a standard of faithfulness; a board member must give undivided allegiance when making decisions affecting the organization. This means that a board member can never use information obtained as a member for personal gain, but must act in the best interests of the organization.
- Duty of Obedience
The duty of obedience requires board members to be faithful to the organization’s mission. They are not permitted to act in a way that is inconsistent with the central goals of the organization. A basis for this rule lies in the public’s trust that the organization will manage donated funds to fulfill the organization’s mission. This duty also requires board members to obey the law and the organization’s internal rules and regulations.
- Attend all board and committee meetings and functions, such as special events.
- Be informed about the organization’s mission, services, policies, and programs.
- Review agenda and supporting materials prior to board and committee meetings.
- Serve on committees or task forces and offer to take on special assignments.
- Make a personal financial contribution to the organization.
- Inform others about the organization. Advocate for the organization.
- Suggest possible nominees to the board who can make significant contributions to the work of the board and the organization.
- Keep up-to-date on developments in the organization’s field.
- Follow conflict-of-interest and confidentiality policies.
- Refrain from making special requests of the staff.
- Assist the board in carrying out its fiduciary responsibilities, such as reviewing the organization’s financial statements.
- Ability to listen, analyze, think clearly and creatively, and work well with people individually and in a group.
- Willingness to prepare for and attend board and committee meetings, ask questions, take responsibility and follow through on a given assignment, contribute personal and financial resources in a generous way according to circumstances, open doors in the community, advocate for the organization, and evaluate oneself.
- Interest in developing certain skills that you may not possess, such as in cultivating and soliciting funds, cultivating and recruiting board members and other volunteers, reading and understanding financial statements, and learning more about the substantive program area of the organization.
- Possession of honesty, sensitivity to and tolerance of differing views, community-building skills, personal integrity and sense of values, and concern for your nonprofit’s development.
- Oversee board and executive committee meetings.
- Work in partnership with the chief executive to make sure board resolutions are carried out.
- Call special meetings if necessary.
- Appoint all committee chairs and, with the chief executive, recommend who will serve on committees.
- Assist chief executive in preparing board meeting agendas.
- Assist chief executive in conducting new board member orientation.
- Oversee searches for a new chief executive.
- Coordinate chief executive’s annual performance evaluation.
- Work with the governance committee to recruit new board members.
- Act as an alternate spokesperson for the organization.
- Periodically consult with board members on their roles and help them assess their performance.
- Attend all board meetings.
- Serve on the executive committee if one exists.
- Ensure the safety and accuracy of all board records.
- Take board meeting minutes or review minutes if that task is assigned to a staff member.
- Assume responsibilities of the chair in the absence of the board chair, chair-elect, and vice chair.
- Provide notice of meetings of the board and/or of a committee when such notice is required.
- Attend all board meetings.
- Understand financial accounting for nonprofit organizations.
- Serve as the chair of the finance committee.
- Manage, with the finance committee, the board’s review of and action related to the board’s financial responsibilities.
- Work with the chief executive and the chief financial officer to ensure that appropriate financial reports are made available to the board on a timely basis.
- Present the annual budget to the board for approval.
- Review the annual audit and answer board members’ questions about the audit (if there is no audit committee).
- Attend all board meetings.
- Serve on the executive committee if one exists.
- Carry out special assignments as requested by the board chair.
- Understand the responsibilities of the board chair and be able to perform these duties in the chair’s absence.
- Participate as a vital part of the board leadership.
Legally and in practice, all of these definitions describe the same governing body of a nonprofit. The term “trustee” originally referred to the person who has the fiduciary duty for a charitable trust or a foundation. By tradition, higher education institutions also tend to refer to their board members as trustees.
New board members can be selected by current board members; by members, chapters, or affiliates; or by other related groups such as religious bodies or government agencies. By far, the most common method among public charities is election by peers. Board members can re-elect their colleagues and/or others to the board position. This type of a board is called self-perpetuating. A board that elects its own members has the advantage of determining its needs based on the profile of the present board. It can focus on group dynamics, missing skills, or the need for diversity when searching for new board members. This process clearly is labor-intensive for the current board, but it provides an opportunity to bring together a group of committed people who have had a chance to define their mutual goals.
Effective board recruitment follows the principles of matching available resources with existing needs. How does a board know what it needs? It must first clarify what it already has. It relies on a strategic board composition matrix — a recruitment tool that allows it to map out the composition of the present board. This map reveals the missing ingredients and allows the board to focus its search in the right direction.
A board composition matrix forces the board to articulate the kinds of qualities, characteristics, skills, expertise, backgrounds, and various perspectives that make a good board. After becoming sensitive to these attributes and verifying which of them are already there, the board’s governance committee is one step closer to meeting the needs of the board.
Sending applications indiscriminately is a haphazard way to find good board members. Boards shouldn’t get too excited about a candidate who responds positively to a recruitment letter as the first communication. Serious cultivation and information sharing is necessary before inviting a person to serve on your board. An application form, however, can help gather information on the interests, background, and skills of a prospective board member with whom the governance committee has already communicated and established a mutual interest.
If an interested person contacts the organization and asks for an application form to join the board, this is an excellent moment to start serious communication. Willing bodies do not always make good board members, but genuine interest should not be ignored. Ultimately, if the candidate and the board find themselves on the same wavelength, it is time to extend an application form with a welcome letter.
Information forms used to gather data on your present and potential board members allow you to concentrate your cultivation activities in the right direction. This information also allows you to direct your board members to activities that interest them and serve the board’s needs in the best possible manner. Your form could collect information on the following topics:
- Name, address, contact information
- Special skills or expertise: fundraising, HR, finances, business, PR, technology, legal, industry or mission specific, advocacy, etc.
- Professional background
- Level of education
- Other professional affiliations
- Other board service
- Expected level of gift or possible in-kind donations
- Special interests or hobbies
The objective of board recruitment is to find willing, able, and committed board members. How do you know if a candidate is going to be the right person for your board? You can never be 100 percent sure, but if you ask direct questions you can get pretty close. Here are some examples of questions to ask:
- Why are you interested in our organization?
- Why are you interested in serving on a board?
- Do you have any previous board service, leadership, or volunteer experience? Are you presently serving on any boards?
- What kinds of skills or expertise can you offer? How will the organization benefit from your participation? How do you think we could best take advantage of your expertise?
- What do you expect us to do for you so that your experience is satisfying?
- What kind of time and financial commitment will you be able to make? Are you willing to serve on committees and task forces? Can we expect you to come to board meetings regularly? Would you be able to make a personal contribution?
Most individuals who already serve on a nonprofit board need no outside justification for being a board member; they know what they are doing and why they want to continue doing it. However, there are others who are too shy to join a board or who need someone else to tell them why it makes sense.
Here are some reasons why people join nonprofit boards:
- They know their skills are needed.
- A nonprofit is going to improve and will benefit from their contributions.
- There is a possibility to effect change in an organization.
- They will feel good by doing good.
- They enjoy collaborating with interesting people who have the same interests and values.
- They want to learn new skills.
- They enjoy being recognized for their efforts.
- They want to give back to the community.
- They have found a new reason to live productively.
- They want to have an impact.
- It can be fun.
As for what you should know, serving as a board member is one of the most challenging and rewarding of volunteer assignments. While appointment or election to a board is an honor, board members have important legal and fiduciary responsibilities that require a commitment of time, skill, and resources. Prospective board members do themselves a service and show that they are serious about the commitments they make by asking some basic questions before joining an organization’s board. You can find the answers from the board member who issues the invitation to join; the chief executive of the organization; the board chairperson; other board members, current and former; or written materials.
Good governance depends on enlightened decision making. Board members in turn need to be knowledgeable about the organization’s status and needs if they are to make sound decisions that advance its mission. But boards often say that the information they receive hinders rather than facilitates good governance and strong leadership. They protest that they are overwhelmed with large quantities of irrelevant information, that they don’t get enough information, or that they receive material too late to devote serious attention to it. An effective board information system should focus on decision making, stimulate participation, and support an appropriate balance of responsibility between board and staff.
Types of board information
Management consultant John Carver describes three types of board information:
- Decision information is used to make decisions, such as establishing selection criteria for the chief executive. It looks to the future and is not designed to measure performance.
- Monitoring information enables the board to assess whether its policy directions are being met. It looks to the past and provides a specific survey of performance against criteria. An example is an annual review of an organization’s strategic plan.
- Incidental information is for the general information of the board and not related to board action. Committee reports are frequently in this category.
Too often, board information is primarily incidental information. Although such material is useful for maintaining an overall impression of the administration of the organization, it is not usually specific or substantive enough to help board members make decisions or monitor the organization’s success at carrying out its mission.
Establishing a board information system
Establishing and maintaining a board information system is the joint responsibility of the board chair, board members, the chief executive, and staff members who work with the board. The board should discuss
- what information it needs to do its job
- how often it wants this information
- in what form it needs the information
Given this board feedback, the staff can establish the content, format, and frequency of information it will provide the board.
Characteristics of good board information
Barry S. Bader, a consultant and author specializing in hospital governance, identifies seven guidelines for developing effective board information:
- Concise: Is the information communicated as quickly or as briefly as possible?
- Meaningful: Is the information presented in relationship to a significant factor, such as a goal set by the board, past performance, or comparative data?
- Timely: Is the information relevant to the current agenda?
- Relevant to responsibilities: Does the information help the board or board committee discharge its responsibilities?
- Best available: Is the information the best available indicator of the situation or condition being described? Can better information be provided?
- Context: Is it clear why this information is important?
- Graphic presentation: Could the information be presented better graphically than in words?
Basic ingredients of a board information system
Every board must decide for itself exactly what information it needs. For most organizations, however, the following checklist is a starting point.
At least two weeks before each board meeting:
- Agenda
- Information about issues for discussion, when appropriate
- Financial information
- Committee reports
At least two weeks before the board meeting at which it is discussed:
- Annual budget
- Audit report
- Strategic plan
After each board meeting:
- Minutes
- Reminder of next meeting
Monthly:
- Financial report
- Significant published articles about the organization
Quarterly:
- Financial report
Regularly, when appropriate:
- Memo from chief executive summarizing current activities, accomplishments, and needs
- Updated material for board handbook
- Advance copies of publications, brochures, or promotional material
- Annual report
How should a nonprofit board of directors be structured?
Every board has a fundamental responsibility for self-management — for creating a structure, policies, and procedures that support good governance. The term “board organization” encompasses a variety of tasks, from routine matters, such as preparing a schedule of board meetings, to actions with broader consequences, such as developing a policy about terms of service. Below are some of the most frequent questions board members ask about board organization:
How can we contribute to effective board organization?
To set the stage for efficient board and committee work,
- prepare a written job description for individual board members
- develop an annual schedule of meetings, determined a year in advance
- circulate clear and thorough information materials, including an agenda, to all members two to three weeks before each meeting
- maintain complete and accurate minutes of all meetings
- keep meetings brief and focused; stimulate the broadest possible participation by members
- ask each board member to serve on at least one board committee or task force. (For new members, one committee assignment is sufficient.)
- acknowledge members’ accomplishments and contributions in a variety of ways in the organization’s newsletter, at meetings, in minutes
To encourage smooth functioning committees, follow these additional steps:
- Prepare written statements of committee and task force responsibilities, guidelines and goals. These organizational documents should be reviewed every one to two years and revised if necessary.
- Make work assignments according to the background, expertise, and schedule of each member.
- Distribute tasks among members so that everyone participates but no one is overloaded.
- Create a system of checks and balances to monitor committee members’ work and assure that tasks are completed on schedule.
- Assign an appropriate staff member to work with each committee.
How many board members should we have?
The organization’s structure and needs are among the factors that determine board size. In considering the size of the board, keep these points in mind:
- Every board needs a sufficient range of expertise to accomplish the organization’s mission.
- If a board is too small, its members may be overworked and unproductive.
- If a board is too large, every member may not have the opportunity to participate actively.
What should be the length of a board member’s term?
There are no hard and fast rules for determining board members’ tenure. Many organizations do, however, limit members to two consecutive terms and might require a hiatus of one year before a board member may be reappointed. Many organizations also stagger terms of service so that one half or one third of the board is elected every one or two years for terms of two to four years. Such policies encourage institutional renewal because a board can profit from the experience of veteran board members while welcoming the fresh perspective that new members offer.
What committees should our board have?
Much of the work that a board does is accomplished through its committees and task forces. With the exception of the executive committee, which acts on the board’s behalf, committees recommend action to the full board for discussion and action. Most boards need only a few standing committees — the rest of the work can be accomplished by task forces created for a specific purpose.
Common standing committees include:
- Governance Committee
- Audit Committee
- Finance Committee
- Executive Committee (if needed)
How should committee members be chosen?
Every board member should serve on at least one but preferably no more than two committees or task forces. Members are appointed by the chair in consultation with the governance committee and the chief executive. Committee size depends on the needs of the board and the organization and a common sense assessment of how many people are needed to carry out the committee’s work.
Make committee assignments based on the experience, skills, interests, and available time of board members. Each member must make a serious commitment to participate actively in the work of the committee. If a committee is too large, a small group of members may have a disproportionate amount of responsibility. If a committee is too small, there may not be enough people to get the job done. Board committees may include people who are not board members.
Should the chief staff executive be a member of the board?
Some nonprofits decide to make the chief staff executive an ex officio member of the board, sometimes voting and sometimes nonvoting. This decision should be made carefully. Some believe that board membership is a good idea because it enhances the executive’s position of authority within the organization and strengthens the working partnership between the board and the executive. On the other hand, many feel that board membership blurs the distinction between the board’s responsibilities and the executive’s responsibilities and makes it difficult for the board to assess the executive’s performance objectively.
BoardSource recommends that the chief executive be a nonvoting ex officio member of the board. Whatever the executive’s official status, however, their insights into the daily operations of the organization are essential to decision making by the board.
Other Topics to Consider:
101 Resource | Last updated: February 25, 2020
Resources: Ten Basic Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards, Legal Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards, Governance Committee, The Board Building Cycle: Finding, Engaging, and Strengthening Nonprofit Board Members